T

The Economic Collapse Blog

theeconomiccollapseblog.com · Personal blog · on HN since 2010

An anonymous-style doom blog posting alarmist lists about the US economy, the dollar, taxes, government waste and collapse scenarios.

What HN saysHN commenters mostly cite it as the original source behind secondhand articles or for charts; one asks people to cite it directly rather than Business Insider.
19HN people shared it
11linked it in comments
8stories submitted
13story points
7 years agolast shared
2010people per year2026

Most-shared posts

  1. 1
    Pessimistic Blog on Economy
    2 people · 1 points · first shared 2010 · discussion on HN
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
    A List of 97 Taxes Americans Pay Every Year (2014)
    1 people · 1 points · first shared 2017 · discussion on HN
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
    Netbooks
    1 people · first shared 2010
  10. 10
    Macbooks
    1 people · first shared 2010
  11. 11
    Silver coins
    1 people · first shared 2010
  12. 12
    Emergency food
    1 people · first shared 2010
  13. 13
    Alternative energy
    1 people · first shared 2010
  14. 14
  15. 15

What HN people wrote when they linked it

acdha · 2017-05-28
… and for anyone who isn't familiar with IJ, they're a Koch- funded institution with corporate libertarian bent: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Justice The author of that blog post, well, look at that page and ask how reliable a source he is: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/
hga · 2010-02-08
For the love of god, please cite original articles like this one from the author's blog http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/economic-black-hole-20-rea… instead of Business Insider's tedious "cut it up into a 21 part slide show" reprint shtick.
stinos · 2019-06-08
And tens of millions of pigs in China apparently: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/an-estimated-150-200-milli…
neilxdsouza · 2013-04-13
Here is my visualization of the 16 Trillion Dollars bailout given by the Federal Reserve to the Banks that cannot fail: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/have-you-heard-about-the-1… http://www.forbes.com/sites/traceygreenstein/2011/09/20/the-feds-16-tr… US Population : About 314 million Bailout : USD 16 Trillion = 16000 billion = 16,000,000 million Hence loading factor per person: 16,000,000 / 314 = about 50000 dollars. I.e. The Federal Reserve Loaded every US citizen with an additional burden of USD 50,000
olalonde · 2012-03-19
> The opposite, libertarian answer (and the way we seem to be going right now) The US government is arguably going in the opposite direction of libertarianism. http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/US-Gover… > would be to let those who can't capitalize on the bounty simply suffer. I think most people don't want to let the poor "simply suffer". Libertarians simply argue it shouldn't be government's role to help the poor.
narrator · 2010-12-13
Don't worry. We'll lock down campaign contributions so much that only the six major corporations that control the mainstream media in the U.S can cover their campaigns. >Back in 1983, approximately 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the United States. Today, ownership of the news media has been concentrated in the hands of just six incredibly powerful media corporations. http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/who-owns-the-media-the-6-m…
ergoproxy · 2014-03-19
Letting the banks fail doesn't entail doing nothing and letting people suffer. Hank Paulson's bank bailout proposal got rammed through Congress by the Bush Administration without much consideration of any alternatives. Paulson's plan helped banks and bankers at the expense of everybody else. There were lots of other proposals that got ignored by the press. Here's three different approaches. While I personally favor the third approach, I think its very important to dispel the idea that we didn't have any choice but to bailout the banks, so I want to illustrate a variety of approaches: (1) Steve Keen suggested a debt Jubilee: "monetary injections by the Federal Reserve not into the reserve accounts of banks, but into the bank accounts of the public--but on condition that its first function must be to pay debts down. This would reduce debt directly, but not advantage debtors over savers, and would reduce the profitability of the financial sector while not affecting its solvency" quoted from http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2012/07/22/the-crisis-in-1000-words… (2) Mortgage assistance: put a moratorium on foreclosures; freeze rate hikes in adjustable rate mortgages; help homeowners refinance their mortgages; or replace home borrowing with renting. (3) Ron Paul proposed we abolish the Fed. While the Fed's profits belong to the federal government, the Fed itself is owned by the nationally chartered banks. Therefore, it's power to create money is used to benefit the…
robomartin · 2012-04-29
There's a much deeper question on the whole concept of taxation in general. What is it for and where should the limits be? If you really look around you'll quickly learned that everything is taxed. Everything. Politicians have gotten very good at finding all sorts of areas where they can insert a probe and extract "blood". From gasoline to telephones, communications, dogs, cars, food, air travel, tobacco, etc. Here's one attempt at a list: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/taxed-enough-already Here in California it is not uncommon to hear of more hair-brained schemes to levy taxes on more things. A little-bit here and a little-bit there and politicians have collect billions to keep their gravy train going. Regardless of whether we are talking about personal or corporate taxes, or taxes in general, it is important to always keep in mind what the "mission statement" might be for taxes. Lately the lines on this have blurred. In general terms taxes should be used to run the government, military and reasonable social services (the last one being debatable). Lately, at least in California and other similarly-afflicted states, a huge percentage of taxes are being dedicated to supporting a ridiculous pension infrastructure and a bloated government and public employee sector. Tax increases are being proposed with the sole purpose of finding funding for union pensions. We, then, exist to ensure that the union "class" gets to live happily every-after with their…
batista · 2012-03-01
>> I just don't see that this is what we are currently approaching with automation, etc, but rather huge poor masses and an middle class in decline. > Can you support claim with some facts?* Well, but how about just looking around you? Because arguing for obvious facts gets tiresome after a while. http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/10/17/disturbing-statistics-on-the-de… http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/the-u.s.-middle-class-is-being-wi… http://www.businessinsider.com/22-statistics-that-prove-the-middle-cla… http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/30-statistics-that-show-th… Yes, this is the game played by most people who complain about the "middle class in decline" or "increasing poverty". They increase the definition of "middle class" more rapidly than the living standards of the middle class actually increased, and then whine when reality hasn't met their artificial benchmark. It's not a game --it's how society works. Definitions change according to the social reality. Would you consider YOURSELF middle class if you only had access to what a '50's middle class family had? A 1920's one?

Keyboard shortcuts

/Search
j kNext / previous blog
EnterOpen selected blog
vVisit the blog site
fFollow / unfollow
lSwitch grid / list view
dSwitch dark mode
g hHome
g pTop posts
g tTopics
g fFollowing
g lLiked
g yHistory
g qFAQ
EscBack / close