Chuck Wendig

terribleminds.com · Personal blog · on HN since 2010

Chuck Wendig is a novelist who writes profane, humorous posts on writing, freelancing, publishing and current events.

What HN saysHN links it mainly for his freelancing essay, which one commenter notes appeared alongside another post on the topic, so HN gives little opinion.
21HN people shared it
2linked it in comments
20stories submitted
356story points
8 months agolast shared
2010people per year2026

Most-shared posts

  1. 1
  2. 2
    AI and the Fetishization of Ideas
    2 people · 3 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
  3. 3
  4. 4
    The Great Surrender: How We Gave Up and Let Covid Win
    1 people · 20 points · first shared 2022 · 34 comments on HN
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
    The funniest critique of Google+ so far
    1 people · 2 points · first shared 2011 · discussion on HN
  8. 8
  9. 9
    Things Every Writer Should Know
    1 people · 2 points · first shared 2011 · 1 comments on HN
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Wendig’s Heirloom Apple Review, 2021
    1 people · 1 points · first shared 2021 · discussion on HN
  13. 13
  14. 14
    Writer Resolutions for 2013 (and beyond)
    1 people · 1 points · first shared 2013 · discussion on HN
  15. 15
    Writing Advice Is Bullshit (2015)
    1 people · 1 points · first shared 2024 · discussion on HN

What HN people wrote when they linked it

superk · 2010-09-21
Oh man - a couple of days ago there was this one (Want to be a freelancer? Just punch yourself in the face): http://terribleminds.com/ramble/2010/09/07/want-to-be-a-freelancer-jus… Now I don't know what to believe!!
ryanklee · 2024-01-06
1. Tyson dismissed the intellectual value of philosophy in a podcast, which led to criticism from those within the discipline[1]. 2. He has been quoted saying, "What they teach in the humanities is not 'skepticism' or 'critical thinking.' It's mental masturbation disguised as critical thinking"[5]. 3. Tyson warned that philosophy "can really mess you up" and has implied that philosophy does not progress in the way science does[5]. 4. His attitude towards philosophy has been characterized as science-defeating by some, as it dismisses the role of philosophy in addressing moral and aesthetic questions that science cannot answer[6]. 5. Tyson's comments have sparked discussions and defenses of the humanities and philosophy, with critics arguing that his views are overly simplistic and do not represent the true value and diversity of philosophical inquiry[1][4][5][6]. [1] Neil DeGrasse Tyson is Wrong about Philosophy https://benjaminstudebaker.com/2014/05/13/neil-degrasse-tyson-is-wrong… [2] An Open Letter to Neil deGrasse Tyson https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/2521di/an_open_letter_to_… [3] Neil deGrasse Tyson and the Value of Philosophy https://www.huffpost.com/entry/neil-degrasse-tyson-and-the-value-of-ph… [4] Why Does Neil deGrasse Tyson Hate Philosophy? https://www.realclearscience.com/articles/2014/05/22/why_does_neil_deg… [5] Please Save Me from Neil DeGrasse…

Keyboard shortcuts

/Search
j kNext / previous blog
EnterOpen selected blog
vVisit the blog site
fFollow / unfollow
lSwitch grid / list view
dSwitch dark mode
g hHome
g pTop posts
g tTopics
g fFollowing
g lLiked
g yHistory
g qFAQ
EscBack / close