Taranis

taranis.ie · Personal blog · on HN since 2025

A blog by an engineer with a physics-based perspective, covering space datacenters and the prospects of an AI downturn.

What HN saysCommenters repeatedly cite its datacenters-in-space post as a good, physics-based argument that the idea is impractical, noting its author's NASA background.
17HN people shared it
15linked it in comments
2stories submitted
697story points
4 months agolast shared
2025people per year2026

Most-shared posts

  1. 1
    Datacenters in space aren't going to work
    16 people · 498 points · first shared 2025 · 437 comments on HN
  2. 2
    A new AI winter is coming?
    1 people · 199 points · first shared 2025 · 280 comments on HN

What HN people wrote when they linked it

DangitBobby · 2026-06-29
Transcontinental railroads weren't fighting against physics. There's a reason people are pretty sure it won't work and it's not the difficulty of getting them into space or maintening them space or generally protecting them from space. Of course, those are all considerations as well. No, it's the cooling. https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo…
Springtime · 2026-06-14
There was also this[1] analysis in late 2025 from a former NASA engineer that looked at the impracticability. [1] https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo…
yogthos · 2026-05-22
nothing about data centres in space makes sense if you understand even a modicum of physics https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo…
t312227 · 2026-02-04
hello, as always: imho. (!) we already had this topic before, an example for another good article regarding physical arguments against this idea would be: "Datacenters in space are a terrible, horrible, no good idea" ~ late 2025 * https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo… TL;DR: It's not going to work. idk ... maybe elon has something else in mind with this merger!? cheers, a..z
borland · 2026-02-03
It's a solved problem. The physics is simply such that it's really inefficient. > ... we'd need a system 12.5 times bigger, i.e., roughly 531 square metres, or about 2.6 times the size of the relevant solar array. This is now going to be a very large satellite, dwarfing the ISS in area, all for the equivalent of three standard server racks on Earth. https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo… The gist of it is that about 99% of cooling on earth works by cold air molecules (or water) bumping into hot ones, and transferring heat. There's no air in space, so you need a radiator 99x larger than you would down here. That adds up real fast.
decimalenough · 2026-02-03
The biggest problem with satellite internet was the costs involved, which SpaceX has pretty much solved. Datacenters in space, on the other hand, are a terrible idea because of the laws of physics, which will not get "solved" anytime soon. But don't take it from me, listen to this guy with a PhD in space electronics who worked at NASA and Google; https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo…
invalidusernam3 · 2026-02-03
Here's an interesting post linked elsewhere in this thread https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo…
gcanyon · 2026-02-03
> orbital data centers I'm not a rocket scientist, but how do they plan to dispose of all the waste heat? The ISS carefully maintains its temperature, and it's not running racks-full of servers. edit to add: this guy, who is a rocket scientist, explains exactly why it's a terrible idea, and yes, heat management is one reason. https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo…
dialogbox · 2026-02-03
ISS solar panels only make 200kw at max. https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo… It's not comparable to any data center.
thelastgallon · 2026-02-03
Datacenters in space are a terrible, horrible, no good idea: https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo… Discussed earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46087616
dgoldstein0 · 2026-02-03
More details from a guy who has thought this through https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo…
perryprog · 2026-02-02
It's really not that simple. See this for a good explanation of why: https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo…
n_u · 2026-02-02
A former NASA engineer with a PhD in space electronics who later worked at Google for 10 years wrote an article about why datacenters in space are very technically challenging: https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo… I don't have any specialized knowledge of the physics but I saw an article suggesting the real reason for the push to build them in space is to hedge against political pushback preventing construction on Earth. I can't find the original article but here is one about datacenter pushback: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-08-20/ai-and-crypto-da… But even if political pushback on Earth is the real reason, it still seems datacenters in space are extremely technically challenging/impossible to build.
piskov · 2025-12-15
There was already an article of how this thing is just ain’t gonna happen: https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-goo… — If I were to guess, my first bet would be grand PR damage control for all the Mexicans, Irish, and what have you as in “don’t worry, we’ll soon be in space and out of your backyard” (no, they won’t). https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/20/technology/ai-data-center-backlash-…

Keyboard shortcuts

/Search
j kNext / previous blog
EnterOpen selected blog
vVisit the blog site
fFollow / unfollow
lSwitch grid / list view
dSwitch dark mode
g hHome
g pTop posts
g tTopics
g fFollowing
g lLiked
g yHistory
g qFAQ
EscBack / close