Sander Dieleman

sander.ai · Personal blog · on HN since 2023

Sander Dieleman, a machine learning researcher, writes detailed explainers on diffusion models, latent generative modelling, and related topics.

What HN saysHN commenters recommend it for alternative interpretations of diffusion and cite specific posts on latents, perspectives, and the spectral autoregression view.
27HN people shared it
9linked it in comments
25stories submitted
375story points
6 months agolast shared
2023people per year2026

Most-shared posts

  1. 1
    Generative Modelling in Latent Space
    9 people · 31 points · first shared 2025 · discussion on HN
  2. 2
    Diffusion Is Spectral Autoregression
    5 people · 225 points · first shared 2024 · 62 comments on HN
  3. 3
    Perspectives on Diffusion
    4 people · 2 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
  4. 4
    Guidance: A cheat code for diffusion models
    3 people · 13 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
  5. 5
    Diffusion Language Models
    3 people · 5 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
  6. 6
    Generating music in the waveform domain (2020)
    2 people · 92 points · first shared 2024 · 41 comments on HN
  7. 7
    Musings on Typicality
    2 people · 3 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
  8. 8
    The Paradox of Diffusion Distillation
    2 people · 1 points · first shared 2024 · discussion on HN
  9. 9
    Diffusion
    2 people · first shared 2023
  10. 10
    Noise schedules considered harmful (2024)
    1 people · 1 points · first shared 2026 · discussion on HN
  11. 11
    Learning the Integral of a Diffusion Model
    1 people · 1 points · first shared 2026 · discussion on HN
  12. 12
    The Geometry of Diffusion Guidance
    1 people · 1 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
  13. 13
    Slides meetup
    1 people · first shared 2026

What HN people wrote when they linked it

vvolhejn · 2025-10-22
There's a great blog post from Sander Dieleman about exactly this - why do we need a two step pipeline, in particular for images and audio? https://sander.ai/2025/04/15/latents.html For text, there are a few papers that train the tokenization and language model end-to-end, see: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07185
sl8r · 2025-02-15
Hey! I’m the post author. Highly recommend Sander Dieleman’s blog for alternative interpretations https://sander.ai/2023/07/20/perspectives.html I personally find the SDEs the most intuitive, and the deterministic ODE / consistency models / rectified flow stuff as ideas that are easier to understand after the SDEs. But not everyone agrees!
vivzkestrel · 2026-05-07
- just a headsup - your links to the slides for deeplearning you did here https://sander.ai/2014/05/29/slides-meetup.html are broken
benanne · 2026-05-06
I briefly covered that connection in an earlier blog post: https://sander.ai/2023/07/20/perspectives.html#flow ... but it's definitely something that might deserve a longer-form treatment at some point :)
tripplyons · 2025-10-20
Here's a blog post I liked that explains a connection: https://sander.ai/2024/09/02/spectral-autoregression.html They call diffusion a form of "spectral autoregression", because it tends to first predict lower frequency features, and later predict higher frequency features.
throwaway2562 · 2025-03-12
I’m trying to understand what the ‘spectral’ interpretation of IMM is: but perhaps I shouldn’t https://sander.ai/2024/09/02/spectral-autoregression.html
GaggiX · 2024-03-27
There are so many similar diffusion model distillation techniques these days that it's become hard to tell the difference between them, this is probably the fourth example I've seen that uses adversarial loss to distill the model, the others being UFOgen, some other work by StabilityAI on SDXL-turbo and similar, SDXL-Lightning by ByteDance. I found this blog page that explains some of the differences: https://sander.ai/2024/02/28/paradox.html
SleekEagle · 2023-04-19
https://sander.ai/2022/01/31/diffusion.html The differences are thoroughly discussed here. From my point of view, while there is this surface-level similarity, the training process for diffusion models is directly a result of the mathematical framework on which they are defined which is distinct from denoising autoencoders. I'd suggest reading the above blog if you are interested, it is thorough!

Keyboard shortcuts

/Search
j kNext / previous blog
EnterOpen selected blog
vVisit the blog site
fFollow / unfollow
lSwitch grid / list view
dSwitch dark mode
g hHome
g pTop posts
g tTopics
g fFollowing
g lLiked
g yHistory
g qFAQ
EscBack / close