Making Instapaper

This is probably the post I'm thinking of: https://medium.com/making-instapaper/bookmarklets-are-dead-d470d4bbb62… https://archive.ph/hDumY

Indeed. The "should not" in the spec is a big loophole. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23357 https://medium.com/making-instapaper/bookmarklets-are-dead-d470d4bbb62… https://blog.github.com/2013-04-19-content-security-policy/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7607605/does-content-security-poli…

Bookmarklets are Dead… …we just don’t know it yet. https://medium.com/making-instapaper/bookmarklets-are-dead-d470d4bbb62…

Post-mortem: https://medium.com/making-instapaper/instapaper-outage-cause-recovery-…

Which DB at AWS: https://aws.amazon.com/products/databases/ Also shouldn't AWS warn them that this was about to happen? Edit 1: DynamoDB says: "There is no practical limit on a table's size. Tables are unconstrained in terms of the number of items or the number of bytes." The SQL databases say this: "The Amazon Aurora engine will automatically grow the size of your database volume as your database storage needs grow, up to a maximum of 64 TB or a maximum you define. The MySQL, MariaDB, Oracle, and PostgreSQL engines allow you to provision up to 6 TB of storage on-the-fly with zero downtime." So they either hit 64TB or 6TB of data I assume? EDIT 2: According to this they are MySQL based: https://medium.com/making-instapaper/rebuilding-instapaper-search-7fae…

Bookmarklets are on the way out https://medium.com/making-instapaper/bookmarklets-are-dead-d470d4bbb62… Also see: content security policy (CSP)