Tim Berners-Lee

medium.com/@timberners_lee · Personal blog · on HN since 2017

Tim Berners-Lee's Medium posts on the state of the web, its anniversaries, open letters, and the Solid project.

What HN saysHN links it for his Solid announcement and open letters; one commenter says his letter misses whether public knowledge should be enclosed by private companies.
18HN people shared it
3linked it in comments
15stories submitted
121story points
3 months agolast shared
2017people per year2026

Most-shared posts

  1. 1
    One Small Step for the Web…
    10 people · 53 points · first shared 2018 · 3 comments on HN
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
    One Small Step for the Web…
    1 people · 2 points · first shared 2018 · 1 comments on HN
  6. 6

What HN people wrote when they linked it

atlasunshrugged · 2018-09-29
From his Medium post "In 2009, I said, “The web as I envisaged it we have not seen yet.” That was because people were using the web just for documents, not for the data of a big web-wide computer. Since then, we have seen a wave of open data, but not of read-write data. For example, much open government data is produced through a one-way pipeline, so we can only view it. With Solid, it becomes a read-write web where users can interact and innovate, collaborate and share." https://medium.com/@timberners_lee/one-small-step-for-the-web-87f92217…
DrScientist · 2026-07-28
The letter misses out the key issue here. Should the worlds public knowledge be enclosed by a few powerful private companies or should it be available to all? The original vision for the web was a decentralized, open information sharing space designed to empower humanity. In my view the effort to privatise that via LLM distillation is the antithesis of that vision. https://medium.com/@timberners_lee/marking-the-webs-35th-birthday-an-o… In terms of the risks mentioned in the letter - I agree with the risk of AI enabling a powerful surveillance state - however I don't see that as a solely Chinese problem. The other risk mentioned - that knowledge can be dangerous - sure - but ultimately here, as there are so many low tech ways to cause mayhem, the ultimate protection is to have a society where people don't want to do it. And perhaps more importantly I'd note that the primary tool to justify a powerful surveillance state is the fear of terrorism ( and others ).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Search
j kNext / previous blog
EnterOpen selected blog
vVisit the blog site
fFollow / unfollow
lSwitch grid / list view
dSwitch dark mode
g hHome
g pTop posts
g tTopics
g fFollowing
g lLiked
g yHistory
g qFAQ
EscBack / close