Hazel Weakly
hazelweakly.me · Personal blog · on HN since 2022
Hazel Weakly writes about observability, developer tooling, AI tools, scaling Mastodon, and leadership in engineering organizations.
What HN saysHN commenters link her post on building AI tools backwards as a detailed look at AI coding. The given comments say little else about her.
24HN people shared it
2linked it in comments
31stories submitted
599story points
9 months agolast shared
2022people per year2026
Most-shared posts
- 1Scaling Mastodon: The Compendium6 people · 11 points · first shared 2022 · discussion on HN
- 2Building better AI tools4 people · 349 points · first shared 2025 · 179 comments on HN
- 3So You Want to Hire for Developer Tooling4 people · 7 points · first shared 2023 · 1 comments on HN
- 4Home Baked Abstractions, Store Bought Implementations3 people · 8 points · first shared 2024 · discussion on HN
- 5Why Is Browser Observability Hard – Hazel Weakly2 people · 6 points · first shared 2024 · discussion on HN
- 6Observability 3.02 people · 4 points · first shared 2024 · discussion on HN
- 7Scaling Innovation: Building Ecosystems2 people · 3 points · first shared 2025 · discussion on HN
- 8To Be a Leader of Systems2 people · 3 points · first shared 2025 · discussion on HN
- 9Pick Your Distributed Poison1 people · 104 points · first shared 2024 · 23 comments on HN
- 10Cache Me Not, Cache Me, Cache Me Not1 people · 57 points · first shared 2024 · 21 comments on HN
- 11Redefining Observability1 people · 39 points · first shared 2024 · 21 comments on HN
- 12Scale Down to Scale Up1 people · 3 points · first shared 2025 · discussion on HN
- 13You Have One Voice1 people · 2 points · first shared 2024 · 1 comments on HN
- 14Engineering Language as a Vehicle of Innovation1 people · 1 points · first shared 2024 · discussion on HN
- 15The Power of Being New: A Proven Recipe for High Impact1 people · 1 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
What HN people wrote when they linked it
hosh · 2025-09-03
There is a form of delegation that develops the people involved, so that people can continue to contribute and grow. Each individual can contribute what is unique to them, and grow more capable as they do so. Both people, and the community of those people remain alive, lively, and continue to grow. Some people call this paradigm “regenerative”; only living systems regenerate.
There is another form of delegation where the work needed to be done is imposed onto another, in order to exploit and extract value. We are trying to do this with LLMs now, but we also did this during the Industrial Revolution, and before that, humanity enslaved each other to get the labor to extract value out of the land. This value extraction leads to degeneration, something that happens when living systems dies.
While the Industrial Revolution afforded humanity a middle-class, and appeared to distribute the wealth that came about — resulting in better standards of living — it came along with numerous ills that as a society, we still have not really figured out.
I think that, collectively, we figure that the LLMs can do the things no one wants to do, and so _everyone_ can enjoy a better standard of living. I think doing it this way, though, leads to a life without purpose or meaning. I am not at all convinced that LLMs are going to give us back that time … not unless we figure out how to develop AIs that help grow humans instead of replacing them.
The following article is an example of what I mean…
JoshTriplett · 2025-06-02
Exactly. See also https://hazelweakly.me/blog/stop-building-ai-tools-backwards/ for a detailed look at this aspect of AI coding.