Apache Fory Blog

fory.apache.org · Company blog · on HN since 2025

The Apache Fory project blog, announcing releases and benchmarks of its serialization framework for Java, Rust, C++, and other languages.

What HN saysHN commenters question its "10x faster" claims and benchmark data, and ask about schema handling and cross-language use, while linking docs and type mappings.
15HN people shared it
8linked it in comments
16stories submitted
100story points
3 months agolast shared
2025people per year2026

Most-shared posts

  1. 1
    Apache Fory JSON: Fast JSON Serialization for Java
    3 people · 4 points · first shared 2026 · 1 comments on HN
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
    Apache Fory C++: 10x faster serialization than protobuf
    2 people · 5 points · first shared 2026 · 1 comments on HN
  5. 5
    Apache Fury Is Now Apache Fory
    2 people · 5 points · first shared 2025 · 3 comments on HN
  6. 6
    Benchmark
    2 people · first shared 2025
  7. 7
  8. 8
    Apache Fory Graduates to Top-Level Apache Project
    1 people · 3 points · first shared 2025 · 1 comments on HN
  9. 9
  10. 10
    Apache Fory v1.0.0 Serialization Framework Released
    1 people · 1 points · first shared 2026 · discussion on HN
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
    Xlang type mapping
    1 people · first shared 2025
  14. 14
    Compiler
    1 people · first shared 2026
  15. 15
    User
    1 people · first shared 2025

What HN people wrote when they linked it

Someone · 2026-03-18
That page doesn’t say “10× faster” in its title, or, AFAICT, anywhere. Title is “Introducing Apache Fory™ C++: Blazing-Fast, Type-Safe Serialization for Modern C++” Also, the data in https://fory.apache.org/blog/fory_cpp_blazing_fast_serialization_frame… doesn’t show that. (It is a good intro page that sells the product well)
kenhwang · 2025-10-28
Looks like there's a type mapping chart for supported types: https://fory.apache.org/docs/docs/guide/xlang_type_mapping Otherwise, the schema seems to be derived from the class being serialized for typed languages, or otherwise annotated in code. The serializer and deserializer code must be manually written to be compatible instead of both sides being codegen'd to match from a schema file. He's the example I found for python: https://fory.apache.org/docs/docs/guide/python_serialization#cross-lan…
athorax · 2025-10-28
I am confused on this as well, they list polyglot teams[0] as their top use case and consider not needing schema files a feature [0] https://fory.apache.org/blog/2025/10/29/fory_rust_versatile_serializat…
jasonjmcghee · 2025-10-28
Maybe I'm missing it, but they mention Flatbuffers a lot here, then don't show benchmarks: https://fory.apache.org/blog/fury_blazing_fast_multiple_language_seria… But flatbuffers is _much_ faster than protobuf/json: https://flatbuffers.dev/benchmarks/
dietr1ch · 2025-10-28
I get a 404 on https://fory.apache.org/docs/benchmarks/rust You can browse https://fory.apache.org/docs/, but I didn't find any benchmarks directory
shinypenguin · 2025-10-28
Benchmark link gives me 404, but I found this link that seems to show the proper benchmarks: https://fory.apache.org/docs/docs/introduction/benchmark

Keyboard shortcuts

/Search
j kNext / previous blog
EnterOpen selected blog
vVisit the blog site
fFollow / unfollow
lSwitch grid / list view
dSwitch dark mode
g hHome
g pTop posts
g tTopics
g fFollowing
g lLiked
g yHistory
g qFAQ
EscBack / close