Nick Coghlan

> What happens in a few years when Python 4 renders all Python 3 code incompatible? Ah, the classic "they did it once so they'll definitely do it every single time from now on" argument. Nick Coghlan, one of the Python core developers, said "Python 4.0 will merely be "the release that comes after Python 3.9"" [0], so I think your concerns are ill-based. [0] https://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html

This post: https://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html

http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html It will be backward compatible (unless there is an absolute need to break), but just keep Python 4 out of your head. For now, they predict just 3.10+

Yup. And the developers learned their lesson and aren't going to do it again. https://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html

It has massive support and libraries for almost anything imaginable. It's not dying. Yes, the transition from 2 to 3 is a bit of a hiccup, but it's going to be around for a long time! A tad bit old, but read this: http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2012/10/pythons-future-global-p… TL;DR: No.

I believe they said they were going to try very hard to not do major backwards compatible breaking changes again. > My current expectation is that Python 4.0 will merely be "the release that comes after Python 3.9". That's it. No profound changes to the language, no major backwards compatibility breaks - going from Python 3.9 to 4.0 should be as uneventful as going from Python 3.3 to 3.4 (or from 2.6 to 2.7). I even expect the stable Application Binary Interface (as first defined in PEP 384) to be preserved across the boundary. http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html (which was linked by Guido from his Twitter).

From Guido: he expects "Python 4.0 will merely be "the release that comes after Python 3.9". That's it. No profound changes to the language, no major backwards compatibility breaks" http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html Would be nice if it was simply 3.10 not 4.0, as there's much discussion on that too.

Not likely anymore: http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html

The Python developers plan to never break syntax or stdlib compatibility again. Core developer Nick Coghlan wants to see 4.0 within the decade but he wants it to be "uneventful". [1] In that way, it would be a lot like Python 2.0, which only broke compatibility in obscure ways, but added new ways to do things. Here are some of my wild guesses at what features Python would want to commemorate with a 4.0 release: - An easy, Pythonic way to opt out of the Global Interpreter Lock. (The GIL clearly isn't going away because so much extension code needs it, but that doesn't mean all code has to suffer from the GIL for eternity.) - UTF-8 as the guaranteed default encoding, instead of trying to infer anything from stupid locale shit. (This wouldn't break any code that wasn't broken already.) - More built-in syntax to support NumPy. [1] https://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.html

Guido has stated to not compare semver in the past.[0] Will there be a 3.10 or go to 4.0 after 3.9, per one of his core developers?[1] It's hard to tell with Python's leadership (no intentional mockery of the term leadership). My guess is that they'll indeed push onwards to Python4 as soon as possible. This being another attempt to make Python2 look as old and crufty as possible. "You're still on Python2? Wow, I'm on 4!". That's the type of political and psychological game the Python core dev team has been playing since 2008 with 3's release. Right alongside the 2020 EOL, another political move. Even though Python 2.7.'10' was never supposed to exist but they went back on that. This because Python3 is mere technical churn, it is not true technical innovation. The issue here is really one with the Python core development team. They have also adopted every niche feature into Python3 by whoever came along to ask for it.[2] This was done for the same reasons as the relative rush to rebrand the failed 3.x branch as 4. An attempt to stir up any hype possible for 3.0+. They got so much wrong with Python3. Feature soup, unicode, and performance losses over 2. Unicode-by-default is the big deal and they didn't even get that right. They simply remapped unicode to str. Which for such a big breaking change, should've been UTF8 alongside other new languages such as Go.[3] But it's worse than that, Python3's feature soup continues in 3.6 there will likely be a 4th string formatting…