Malwarebytes Labs

blog.malwarebytes.org · Company blog · on HN since 2012

Malwarebytes Labs, the security firm's research blog, reports on malware, malvertising, ransomware, and Mac exploits found in the wild.

What HN saysHN cites it as a source on malvertising, such as ad-network abuse on major publishers, and on Mac exploits like the dyld_print_to_file bug.
53HN people shared it
12linked it in comments
45stories submitted
443story points
5 years agolast shared
2012people per year2026

Most-shared posts

  1. 1
    OS X sudoers exploit found in the wild
    2 people · 278 points · first shared 2015 · 173 comments on HN
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Reader's Digest site has infected readers for days
    2 people · 3 points · first shared 2015 · 1 comments on HN
  4. 4
    Large Angler Malvertising Campaign Hits Top Publishers
    2 people · 2 points · first shared 2016 · discussion on HN
  5. 5
  6. 6
    Was Mac OS X really the most vulnerable in 2015?
    1 people · 70 points · first shared 2016 · 24 comments on HN
  7. 7
    eFast browser hijacks file associations
    1 people · 8 points · first shared 2015 · 2 comments on HN
  8. 8
    LeChiffre, Ransomware Run Manually
    1 people · 8 points · first shared 2016 · discussion on HN
  9. 9
  10. 10
    Stopping Malware Distribution at the Source
    1 people · 5 points · first shared 2012 · 2 comments on HN
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Gate to Nuclear EK Uses Fake CloudFlare DDoS Check
    1 people · 4 points · first shared 2016 · discussion on HN
  13. 13
    Large Angler Malvertising Campaign Hits Top Publishers
    1 people · 4 points · first shared 2016 · discussion on HN
  14. 14
    Hacking Team Leak Exposes New Flash Player Zero Day
    1 people · 3 points · first shared 2015 · discussion on HN
  15. 15
    Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Vulnerability Disclosure
    1 people · 3 points · first shared 2016 · discussion on HN

What HN people wrote when they linked it

caleb23 · 2014-04-13
I would recommend an air gap, disabling autorun, removing the CD hardware, and any hardware used to connect to the internet. You could also remove any other hardware and uninstall the drivers you don't need such as a webcam. Here is a good article on the Malwarebytes Anti-malware blog for some recommendations: http://blog.malwarebytes.org/security-threat/2014/04/windows-xp-you-ha…
archon810 · 2016-06-14
This is laughable. If site owners could go to jail every time a 3rd-party code they're not fully responsible for does something bad, they'd all be in jail now. https://blog.malwarebytes.org/threat-analysis/2015/08/large-malvertisi… http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/03/big-name-sites-hit-by-rash-of-… Etc.
tombrossman · 2016-05-31
No, they don't actually serve all ads. I imagine they know not to pass off a request from a HTTPS page to a HTTP-only server (mixed-content blocking would give a near-100% failure rate) but here is an example of Google's Doubleclick network being used to spread malware: https://blog.malwarebytes.org/threat-analysis/2014/09/googles-doublecl…
pacquiao882 · 2015-08-16
It was not fixed. There are currently no plans to fix it in 10.10. https://blog.malwarebytes.org/mac/2015/08/dyld_print_to_file-exploit-f…
jfuhrman · 2015-04-01
There are still lot of Google ads on download sites that are extremely misleading and look like download buttons. http://blog.malwarebytes.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Ad8.png As I wrote in another comment, even YCombinator invested in a bundleware company and PG defended it, so I guess the problem is deep rooted. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9283176
himal · 2014-03-03
You might wanna read this http://blog.malwarebytes.org/fraud-scam/2014/02/netflix-phishing-scam-… Edit:You might wanna scroll up a bit becasue the site header is blocking the comment.
arm · 2015-08-23
“You're free to want sites to work without JS, but to be realistic about it, that battle was lost loooong ago.” Sites should at least work without JavaScript. Or are you saying we should just throw accessibility under the bus? “It's probably more useful to figure out how to make the all-sites-require-js world more secure and less trackable than to try to turn back the clock 20 years.” Blocking JavaScript works right now. Or are you saying end users should just patiently wait until these issues affecting them right now are fixed? It’s not like it isn’t happening… consider how many people have been tricked even by something like this¹. My parents are actually pretty new to the Internet, and I’ve made sure that I have them using something like NoScript. Of course, it breaks some sites for them, but that’s far preferable to them accidentally infecting their computer and putting their financial info at risk. ―――――― ¹ — https://blog.malwarebytes.org/fraud-scam/2013/07/fbi-ransomware-now-ta…

Keyboard shortcuts

/Search
j kNext / previous blog
EnterOpen selected blog
vVisit the blog site
fFollow / unfollow
lSwitch grid / list view
dSwitch dark mode
g hHome
g pTop posts
g tTopics
g fFollowing
g lLiked
g yHistory
g qFAQ
EscBack / close