1000-Word Philosophy
1000wordphilosophy.com · Group blog · on HN since 2018
1000-Word Philosophy is a site of short introductory philosophy essays written by philosophy professors.
What HN saysHN commenters recommend it for concise introductions, though one questions whether an essay with long notes really fits the thousand-word limit.
15HN people shared it
7linked it in comments
9stories submitted
68story points
9 months agolast shared
2018people per year2026
Most-shared posts
- 11k Word Philosophy3 people · 19 points · first shared 2018 · 3 comments on HN
- 2Kants theory of the sublime2 people · first shared 2024
- 3What Is Philosophy? A survey of some answers1 people · 42 points · first shared 2020 · 30 comments on HN
- 4Hylomorphism1 people · 2 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
- 5Robert Nozick's Wilt Chamberlain Argument1 people · 1 points · first shared 2026 · discussion on HN
- 6The Philosophy of Humor: What Makes Something Funny? (2022)1 people · 1 points · first shared 2023 · discussion on HN
- 7Aristotle on Friendship: What Does It Take to Be a Good Friend? (2023)1 people · 1 points · first shared 2024 · discussion on HN
- 8The Problem of No Best World (2014)1 people · 1 points · first shared 2019 · discussion on HN
- 9Camus on the Absurd: The Myth of Sisyphus1 people · 1 points · first shared 2024 · discussion on HN
- 10Karl marxs conception of alienation1 people · first shared 2019
- 11Descartes i think therefore i am1 people · first shared 2021
- 12Hell is other people1 people · first shared 2022
What HN people wrote when they linked it
3rik · 2020-12-06
For very concise introductions, check out the 1000-word essays on philosophical topics written by philosophy professors. https://1000wordphilosophy.com
For a deeper dive also written by philosophy professors, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is unrivaled. https://plato.stanford.edu
Richard Marshall's 3:16am interviews with philosophers are also great. https://www.3-16am.co.uk
didibus · 2021-06-17
Descartes take is refuted by almost all philosophers that followed him, because it's just not a convincing argument.
> The problem with Descartes’ standard for knowledge is that almost no beliefs meet it. Descartes thought he could show how our ordinary knowledge claims are ultimately based on the Cogito, but most philosophers have not been convinced by his case
-- https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2018/11/26/descartes-i-think-therefore-…
Now I don't deny the existence of a reality, I'm not saying everything is an illusion and we're not even real. I'm saying that reality need not be a constant, which would mean that truth can be a moving target, as it can change in time and space.
And then I'm saying that irregardless of if that reality (or ground truth let's call it) is constant or ever changing, when we humans explain that truth, we are always simply modeling our understanding of it for practical purposes. Our search for truth itself is driven by this practical drive, understanding of the ground truth is researched in order to better predict the future or act upon our environment to create the future we'd prefer.
If you instead think of our explained truths as the absolute ground truth, you are entering the world of human dogma and beliefs, that is a world of personal opinion, with no way to argue or debate anything, its only practical benefits are seeking comfort and/or power.
For me, this was a big "haha" moment. I realized that the opposite of dogma is pragma.…
allturtles · 2024-09-23
> incredible and beautiful new technology
To me, one could call this technology incredible and beautiful in the same way that a detached observer might use those terms to describe a hurricane bearing down on my hometown. In the Kantian sense it is more "sublime"[0] rather than "beautiful", and yet the sublime is experienced as such only if it can be viewed from a position of safety; but there appears to be no safe place from AI.
[0]: https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2023/11/11/kants-theory-of-the-sublime
HansardExpert · 2024-01-19
Hmm
https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2023/11/11/kants-theory-of-the-sublime/
The essay is (roughly 850 words) and I can forgive the not-insignificant pre-amble, but the notes take this up to 2600 words.
Is this really a thousand word essay when it is propped up with so many explanatory notes.
jamal-kumar · 2022-06-27
Yet heaven is each other [1]
[1] https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2021/02/08/hell-is-other-people/
stirfrykitty · 2019-04-10
Good point.
More on this here:
https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2015/05/13/karl-marxs-conception-of-ali…
kaycebasques · 2024-10-01
I also got strong whiffs of nihilism from this post.
Your comment reminded me of Camus's interpretation of Sisyphus:
> As a life filled entirely of mundane and trivial labor, Sisyphus’s existence is meant to illustrate the futility (and absurdity) we confront in our own lives. Camus observes that a person’s life can become, essentially, a mundane routine: “Rising, streetcar, four hours in the office or the factory, meal, streetcar, four hours of work, meal, sleep, and Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday and Sunday according to the same rhythm…” (12-13). Yet, for Camus, Sisyphus is not to be pitied. Sisyphus represents the “absurd hero” because he chooses to live in the face of absurdity. This “choosing to live” is a matter of consciousness, for through his attitude and outlook, Sisyphus can free himself from his punishment and triumph over his situation without being able to change it. Sisyphus is aware of the full extent of his punishment: he is fully conscious of the fate imposed on him by the gods and the utter futility of his existence. His passion, freedom, and revolt, however, make him stronger than the punishment intended to crush him.
https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2019/05/01/camus-on-the-absurd-the-myth…